|
Investorville
![]() Tomments and Tommentary
![]() Who are the best stock pickers? (Page 3)
|
| This topic is 9 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Who are the best stock pickers? |
|
Machiavelli |
Ah the power of analysts. Wow, thank god i'm not an investor in this company: "Next Level Communications (NXTV: news, msgs) was the biggest downside mover on the Nasdaq, diving 54 percent, or 50 to 41 9/16 and setting an all-time low. Lehman Brothers shaved its rating on the stock to a "neutral" from a "buy." See Ratings Game. In a note to clients, Lehman raised concerns over the company's relationship with Qwest Communications (Q: news, msgs), saying he believes it's likely Qwest will not move forward aggressively with US West's plans to deploy VDSL products that had been started prior to its acquisition by Qwest. And Merrill Lynch lowered its rating on the clobbered stock to "near-term accumulate" from a "near-term neutral," indicating that even with Thursday's sell-off, the stock will probably still be overvalued. Merrill noted that Qwest represents about 70 percent of Next Level's revenues this year and would have represented 50 percent of next year's revenues." |
|
InvestorGuide Weekly Administrator |
This columnist has strong opinions of what can we learn from the market's infatuation with Merrill Lynch analyst Henry Blodget. (source: Upside) http://upside.com/texis/mvm/story?id=39983bc60 MutualMinds.com is giving you a chance to become a mutual fund manager. MutualMinds scores how well each stock-picker does. Then, if the SEC approves its application to register mutual fund shares, it will sponsor a fund whose investments are chosen by the community's highest-scoring stock pickers. http://www.mutualminds.com |
|
daltxdave |
Isn't it a good thing when volume increases when a stock goes up and falls off when it is down? I own some MCOM and the stock seems to follow that pattern amazingly well. |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
As portfolio manager for a mutual-fund firm owning 10% of Micros Systems, Tom Rath always found senior executives willing to talk openly about the company. Until this week. (source: MSNBC) http://www.msnbc.com/news/446856.asp |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
The Securities and Exchange Commission voted 3-1 Thursday to approve a controversial rule that will put strict limits on the information companies can share with analysts while shutting out the public, a practice known as Selective Disclosure. (source: MarketWatch) http://cbs.marketwatch.com/archive/20000810/news/current/sec.htx |
|
InvestorGuide Weekly Administrator |
Remember when the Nasdaq and the rest of the markets were soaring last spring? Many financial-news websites were soaring right along with them, dispensing money-making tips to investors by the carload. Like so many internet stocks, though, the market slide in April has helped weed out the winners from the losers among the crowd of stock pundits. http://www.business2.com/content/channels/investing/2000/07/25/14836 The internet has democratized investment research--some would say too much so. Can investors find useful stock tips on web sites devoted to rumormongering? (source: Forbes) http://www.forbes.com/columnists/leitzsolan |
|
infooverload |
One day after Lehman Brothers downgraded Amazon.com, six other firms piled on the hapless stock. Merrill Lynch, Robertson Stephens, SG Cowen, Prudential, Janney Montgomery Scott, and Pacific Crest all lowered their ratings on the giant e-tailer, citing concerns with Amazon's slowing revenue growth. My question is, do these analysts have access to financial reports or research beforehand that would clue them into the earnings reports and/or warnings? I'm sure the answer to that is yes, most of the time. At the very least, they can read previous financial statements like the rest of us. What I'd like to see is an analyst making an upgrade/downgrade change BEFORE an earnings report is released. Making it after just gives them an easy out from a previous announcement or price target. Analysts are way too reactionary... |
|
InvestorGuide Weekly Administrator |
Credit Suisse First Boston filed a lawsuit against a group of eleven Yahoo message board users alleging that they had posted defamatory messages regarding a CS First Boston analyst and seeking $1 million in damages. (source: Yahoo) http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/mf/20000714/bs/cs_first_boston_sues_board_posters_1.html |
|
greenjeans |
I guess the physcial threats are the ultimate accountability... .But seriously, Some analysts will gain serious clout and market moving power if accountability is developed as we ideally see it, so I think banka is right. However, so many folks are going to drift off into obscurity because they are bad at the job. I wonder if the columnists ever get threats? |
|
banka |
While the increased stock picking accountability that the internet is enabling will result in many benefits, I wouldn't count on any reduction in the type of physical threats that are mentioned in the article below. These threats result from the power of stock pickers to move prices (plus short term investors who apparently forgot to factor in the risk that an analyst might say something negative about the stock they're buying)... and even with increased accountability, stock pickers will be able to move prices, perhaps even more so. |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
Several analysts who have downgraded popular stocks in recent months say they have received physical threats from angry investors. Hostile, even homicidal, comments targeted at analysts regularly appear on Internet chat boards hosted by Yahoo and other investor-frequented sites. (source: Cnet) http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-2284054.html |
|
newguy |
This split-off is a step in the right direction. The beginning of a trend? Probably not (e.g. Wit's recent acquisition of Soundview was a step in the wrong direction). But let's cross our fingers that others follow suit... objectivity is a good thing. |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
In the wake of its split-off last month from Legg Mason, the Precursor Group telecommunications-research boutique is marketing itself by trumpeting its analytical independence. A lack of investment banking ties and strict employee stock-ownership policies enable the group to provide the unbiased research that's difficult to find elsewhere, it says. (source: TheStreet.com) http://www.thestreet.com/stocks/brokerages/1001464.html |
|
InvestorGuide Weekly Administrator |
Do conflicts of interest mar analysts' stock picks? (source: Knowledge@Wharton) http://yahoo.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-2212907.html |
|
dude |
I mostly agree with hecubus and Cramer in what they said below. Certainly the average analyst is better than the average iExchange stock picker. But averages aren't what matter. iExchange tracks performance, so if there are only a few exceptional performers, but they are consistently exceptional, you can ignore everyone else. |
| This topic is 9 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 All times are EST (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.43
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.
Press ctrl-D to bookmark this page for future reference.
By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use.
Copyright 2001 InvestorGuide.com Inc.