home | welcome | free registration | new posts | hot boards | ipos | earnings
research | news | portfolio | charts
Get the latest investing news and analysis delivered to
your inbox every evening with InvestorGuide Daily.



UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
  Investorville
  Tomments and Tommentary
  Who are the best stock pickers? (Page 3)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

This topic is 9 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Who are the best stock pickers?
Machiavelli
posted 08-24-2000 05:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Machiavelli      Reply w/Quote
Ah the power of analysts. Wow, thank god i'm not an investor in this company:

"Next Level Communications (NXTV: news, msgs) was the biggest downside mover on the Nasdaq, diving 54 percent, or 50 to 41 9/16 and setting an all-time low. Lehman Brothers shaved its rating on the stock to a "neutral" from a "buy." See Ratings Game. In a note to clients, Lehman raised concerns over the company's relationship with Qwest Communications (Q: news, msgs), saying he believes it's likely Qwest will not move forward aggressively with US West's plans to deploy VDSL products that had been started prior to its acquisition by Qwest. And Merrill Lynch lowered its rating on the clobbered stock to "near-term accumulate" from a "near-term neutral," indicating that even with Thursday's sell-off, the stock will probably still be overvalued. Merrill noted that Qwest represents about 70 percent of Next Level's revenues this year and would have represented 50 percent of next year's revenues."

InvestorGuide Weekly
Administrator
posted 08-21-2000 04:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for InvestorGuide Weekly      Reply w/Quote
This columnist has strong opinions of what can we learn from the market's infatuation with Merrill Lynch analyst Henry Blodget. (source: Upside) http://upside.com/texis/mvm/story?id=39983bc60

MutualMinds.com is giving you a chance to become a mutual fund manager. MutualMinds scores how well each stock-picker does. Then, if the SEC approves its application to register mutual fund shares, it will sponsor a fund whose investments are chosen by the community's highest-scoring stock pickers. http://www.mutualminds.com

daltxdave
posted 08-21-2000 02:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for daltxdave      Reply w/Quote
Isn't it a good thing when volume increases when a stock goes up and falls off when it is down?
I own some MCOM and the stock seems to follow that pattern amazingly well.

InvestorGuide Daily
Administrator
posted 08-16-2000 06:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for InvestorGuide Daily      Reply w/Quote
As portfolio manager for a mutual-fund firm owning 10% of Micros Systems, Tom Rath always found senior executives willing to talk openly about the company. Until this week. (source: MSNBC) http://www.msnbc.com/news/446856.asp

InvestorGuide Daily
Administrator
posted 08-10-2000 06:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for InvestorGuide Daily      Reply w/Quote
The Securities and Exchange Commission voted 3-1 Thursday to approve a controversial rule that will put strict limits on the information companies can share with analysts while shutting out the public, a practice known as Selective Disclosure. (source: MarketWatch) http://cbs.marketwatch.com/archive/20000810/news/current/sec.htx

InvestorGuide Weekly
Administrator
posted 07-31-2000 12:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for InvestorGuide Weekly      Reply w/Quote
Remember when the Nasdaq and the rest of the markets were soaring last spring? Many financial-news websites were soaring right along with them, dispensing money-making tips to investors by the carload. Like so many internet stocks, though, the market slide in April has helped weed out the winners from the losers among the crowd of stock pundits. http://www.business2.com/content/channels/investing/2000/07/25/14836

The internet has democratized investment research--some would say too much so. Can investors find useful stock tips on web sites devoted to rumormongering? (source: Forbes) http://www.forbes.com/columnists/leitzsolan

infooverload
posted 07-28-2000 01:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for infooverload      Reply w/Quote
One day after Lehman Brothers downgraded Amazon.com, six other firms piled on the hapless stock. Merrill Lynch, Robertson Stephens, SG Cowen, Prudential, Janney Montgomery Scott, and Pacific Crest all lowered their ratings on the giant e-tailer, citing concerns with Amazon's slowing revenue growth.

My question is, do these analysts have access to financial reports or research beforehand that would clue them into the earnings reports and/or warnings? I'm sure the answer to that is yes, most of the time. At the very least, they can read previous financial statements like the rest of us.

What I'd like to see is an analyst making an upgrade/downgrade change BEFORE an earnings report is released. Making it after just gives them an easy out from a previous announcement or price target. Analysts are way too reactionary...

InvestorGuide Weekly
Administrator
posted 07-24-2000 02:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for InvestorGuide Weekly      Reply w/Quote
Credit Suisse First Boston filed a lawsuit against a group of eleven Yahoo message board users alleging that they had posted defamatory messages regarding a CS First Boston analyst and seeking $1 million in damages. (source: Yahoo) http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/mf/20000714/bs/cs_first_boston_sues_board_posters_1.html

greenjeans
posted 07-20-2000 12:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for greenjeans      Reply w/Quote
I guess the physcial threats are the ultimate accountability... .

But seriously, Some analysts will gain serious clout and market moving power if accountability is developed as we ideally see it, so I think banka is right. However, so many folks are going to drift off into obscurity because they are bad at the job. I wonder if the columnists ever get threats?

banka
posted 07-20-2000 11:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for banka      Reply w/Quote
While the increased stock picking accountability that the internet is enabling will result in many benefits, I wouldn't count on any reduction in the type of physical threats that are mentioned in the article below. These threats result from the power of stock pickers to move prices (plus short term investors who apparently forgot to factor in the risk that an analyst might say something negative about the stock they're buying)... and even with increased accountability, stock pickers will be able to move prices, perhaps even more so.

InvestorGuide Daily
Administrator
posted 07-19-2000 06:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for InvestorGuide Daily      Reply w/Quote
Several analysts who have downgraded popular stocks in recent months say they have received physical threats from angry investors. Hostile, even homicidal, comments targeted at analysts regularly appear on Internet chat boards hosted by Yahoo and other investor-frequented sites. (source: Cnet) http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-2284054.html

newguy
posted 07-17-2000 07:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for newguy      Reply w/Quote
This split-off is a step in the right direction. The beginning of a trend? Probably not (e.g. Wit's recent acquisition of Soundview was a step in the wrong direction). But let's cross our fingers that others follow suit... objectivity is a good thing.

InvestorGuide Daily
Administrator
posted 07-17-2000 07:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for InvestorGuide Daily      Reply w/Quote
In the wake of its split-off last month from Legg Mason, the Precursor Group telecommunications-research boutique is marketing itself by trumpeting its analytical independence. A lack of investment banking ties and strict employee stock-ownership policies enable the group to provide the unbiased research that's difficult to find elsewhere, it says. (source: TheStreet.com) http://www.thestreet.com/stocks/brokerages/1001464.html

InvestorGuide Weekly
Administrator
posted 07-17-2000 03:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for InvestorGuide Weekly      Reply w/Quote
Do conflicts of interest mar analysts' stock picks? (source: Knowledge@Wharton) http://yahoo.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-2212907.html

dude
posted 07-13-2000 09:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for dude      Reply w/Quote
I mostly agree with hecubus and Cramer in what they said below. Certainly the average analyst is better than the average iExchange stock picker. But averages aren't what matter. iExchange tracks performance, so if there are only a few exceptional performers, but they are consistently exceptional, you can ignore everyone else.

This topic is 9 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 

All times are EST (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.43
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

top | search | help | feedback | newsletter | InvestorGuide | InvestorWords glossary

Press ctrl-D to bookmark this page for future reference.
By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use.
Copyright 2001 InvestorGuide.com Inc.