home | welcome | free registration | new posts | hot boards | ipos | earnings
research | news | portfolio | charts
Get the latest investing news and analysis delivered to
your inbox every evening with InvestorGuide Daily.



UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
  Investorville
  Industry and Market Trends
  Cable Modems vs. DSL (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2  next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Cable Modems vs. DSL
Srini
posted 11-23-1999 09:46 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Srini      Reply w/Quote
Business 2.0 (a new magazine) also says DSL will win out over cable modems. This is from their latest issue:

Cable Modems: Overstated
They drive big mergers involving companies such as AT&T, Excite, and @Home, and have been touted as the savior of peasants toiling under oppressive 56K modems. And they get all the press. But are we getting carried away? Consider: Cable modems use shared bandwidth, meaning that capacity is often shared among hundreds of homes at a time. If you live in a Net-happy neighborhood, that multimegabit-per-second connection can get sliced to a couple hundred kilobits in no time. Installations, meanwhile, are time-consuming and expensive, and cable companies are still trying to iron out numerous kinks such as RF (radio frequency) interference. For now, it's buyer beware.

DSL: Underrated
Digital subscriber lines don't get as much attention as cable modems (and they certainly aren't perfect), but this telco-centric technology is one to watch. The main advantage is that DSL provides a dedicated line, meaning that your bandwidth is yours and yours alone. Granted, you have to be pretty close to a telephone switching center to qualify for service, and twisted pairs of copper aren't the most data-savvy wires around. Still, telcos are making progress faster than expected, doing deals with computer manufacturers, and using their access to millions of existing telephone customers to juice up their marketing efforts. DSL may become quite the dark horse in the fat-pipe stakes.

Machiavelli
posted 11-19-1999 09:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Machiavelli      Reply w/Quote
Big victory yesterday for those siding with DSL technology over cable. The FCC ordered the Baby bells to open up their Internet lines to competition (a la local lines). What this means is that DSL should be available to many more parts of the company (though it does nothing to improve the technology). It is estimated that the 10 million current lines will grow to 50 million by 2002 because of this ruling.

InvestorGuide Weekly
Administrator
posted 11-01-1999 10:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for InvestorGuide Weekly      Reply w/Quote
Scientific American looks at the coming revolution in high-speed communications, and the technologies that will make it possible.
http://www.sciam.com/1999/1099issue/1099clark.html

MaxPower
posted 09-10-1999 02:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MaxPower      Reply w/Quote
Forget about DSL and Cable. This article makes a good case for fiber as the conduit of the future:
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/99/0920/6407198a.htm

dude
posted 07-25-1999 08:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dude      Reply w/Quote
Good cable modem article: http://webreview.com/wr/pub/1999/07/23/platform/index.html

smario
posted 06-16-1999 09:24 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for smario      Reply w/Quote
My own personal feeling is that until the shakeout and consolidation trend in the communications industry calms down, there's no way to tell which technology (if none, one, or both) will win out. Mainly because, currently, there are too many companies involved: for DSL, you have the regional bell, the hardware company, the ISP, (sometimes the LD company), and a deregulated industry that unofficially is not very deregulated. For cable, your have the cable company, hardware company, ISP, and the same deregulation problems. Currently, this means lots of finger pointing, customer service issues, compatibility issues, high prices, and legal battles (all are happening right now). Yet in the future, once we have a number of solid companies who each can provide all levels of the chain to the customer, then we will have a clearer picture of a proven technology, and hopefully lower prices, better value added services, and easy-one-point-of-contact customer service!

rstein7588
posted 06-16-1999 06:53 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rstein7588      Reply w/Quote
daffy,
Might be good for the consumer if there is no winner for a while. The competition could lower the price and improve the service. Cable has a head start, but the stakes are huge! Watch the billions being spent on this battle!

daffy
posted 06-14-1999 04:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for daffy      Reply w/Quote
Cable Modems vs. DSL - which will win?
Cisco's CEO (John Chambers) said last week that he expects DSL will win. As far as I can tell, this is an objective position (Cisco will do fine regardless of which one wins). Agree/disagree?

This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are EST (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Home Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.43
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

top | search | help | feedback | newsletter | InvestorGuide | InvestorWords glossary

Press ctrl-D to bookmark this page for future reference.
By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use.
Copyright 2001 InvestorGuide.com Inc.