|
Investorville
![]() Industry and Market Trends
![]() Today's Market (Page 17)
|
| This topic is 36 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Today's Market |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
The Fed decided not to raise rates, but warned against future inflation. Although the Nasdaq and the Dow both finished higher on the day, the reaction to the announcement was mild. The Nasdaq closed up 81, just over 2%, but gained little ground after the Fed made its announcement. The Dow actually lost ground after the announcement and closed the day only 23 ahead. (source: Washington Post) http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11049-2000Jun28.html Dow Jones Industrials: 10527.79 +23.33 +0.22% Nasdaq Composite: 3940.34 +81.38 +2.11% S&P 500: 1454.82 +4.27 +0.29% 30-year Treasury Bond: 5.963% +0.022 |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
Investors were cautious a day ahead of the Fed's announcement on interest rates. The tech sector was hit the hardest as the Nasdaq lost 53 points, more than 1.25% on the day. The Dow was ahead for most of the day, but was eventualy dragged down into the red, off 39. (source: Washington Post) http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3663-2000Jun27.html Dow Jones Industrials: 10504.46 -38.53 -0.37% |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
Investors looking for buying opportunities found some in the consumer sector and pharmaceuticals, with Philip Morris and Johnson & Johnson leading the Dow up 130. The Nasdaq had a more volatile ride, but closed the day ahead 67, nearly 1.75%. (source: CNNfn) http://cnnfn.com/2000/06/26/markets/markets_newyork Dow Jones Industrials: 10542.99 +138.24 +1.33% Nasdaq Composite: 3912.12 +66.78 +1.74% S&P 500: 1455.31 +13.83 +0.96% 30-year Treasury Bond: 5.983% -0.049 |
|
hecubus |
I'm glad things worked out so nicely for you--there has been a significant amount of talk from technical/semi-technical traders that there is going to be a huge fallout that will last for years on end, but there are enough other people out there that area expecting the equity markets to take off again. I guess we'll see who's right.
quote: |
|
ag8ion |
I got out of equities early this year on the advice of the market timer that I subscribe to. For a while I thought he had blown it for the first time in about 10 years that I had been following him. The techs kept screaming up, and the bonds that he recommended inched higher. Now after 6 months of stomach churning agony (for some) I find that my bond positions have appreciated by about 15% in 6 months and it's been accomplished will little worry. His latest update talks about a coming crisis in the equity markets which I will thankfully avoid. His sight is an interesting one for anybody that's interested. http://www.jasmts.com/visitor/ |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
Investors reacted to the Nasdaq's positive moves early in the week with fear, driving the index down another 91 points, or 2.3% today. Ecommerce giant Amazon was among the hardest hit, dropping 21%. Assets shifted into proven blue chips and lifted the Dow 29 points, although the selling pressure took the index well off of its intraday highs. (source: CNNfn) http://cnnfn.com/2000/06/23/markets/markets_newyork/ Dow Jones Industrials: 10404.75 +28.63 +0.28% |
|
KeithG |
I thought th is was interesting. I mean, I knew things were more volatile, but the thought that we have already had more 2% swings on the Nasdaq this year than all of last year was surprising to me. Is it really the ECNs that are causing this, though? I guess the idea that Market Makers aren't steadying the markets with their mistakes is a factor, but I would think that when you are talking about moving the markets 2%+ it would be sentiment about market fundamentals that would be the key. Just my thoughts. It's from upside: Volatility is on the rise NEW YORK -- Although the Nasdaq's fall on Thursday has to to be placed firmly in the context of its 1,000-point run-up since touching its year-low on May 24, it brings into focus an increasingly pronounced characteristic of the market: Volatility is on the rise. Choppier than ever: "Last year, for the whole of the year, the Nasdaq had 61 trading days with a greater than 2 percent change on a closing basis," Tobin Smith of ChangeWave told UpsideToday. "This year, we've already had 66 trading days with more than a 2 percent change," he said. ECNs: That's because of the increasing popularity of electronic communications networks -- such as Island and Instinet -- as brokers for retail trading, which, at least on the Nasdaq, can account for as much as 65 percent of trading on any given day. Today for instance, 43.6 million shares in Microsoft (MSFT) changed hands on the Nasdaq. But 9.1 million shares, or 20.9 percent, of those shares, came through Instinet, an ECN owned by Reuters. ECNs market themselves on their "neutral position in all transactions," as Instinet puts it in its website blurb -- which means that they effectively cut the market maker out of stock transactions. Middlemen: Market makers buy and sell securities in hopes of turning a profit from a rapid turnover in security positions rather than from holding those positions in anticipation of gradual price movements. The overall effect of the market maker's transactions is to stabilize share prices by stepping up and committing its own capital when no match is found between a bid and an ask. "As more trading goes to ECNs, it reduces the spread -- the spread between bid and ask on the ECNs is virtually nil," said Smith. "And that creates volatility, an auction -- in an auction if no one says 'yes,' the price just goes down," he said. "The rise of the ECNs and the rise of volatility are perfectly matched." But Smith urges investors to use downward volatility to shop for bargains, to "use volatility as your friend, becausre volatility is not going away." |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
After several days of positive action, the Nasdaq took a breather, and it was gasping. The tech index traded in a narrow range for much of the day and then fell sharply towards the end of the trading day. The Nasdaq closed down 126, more than 3%. The Dow was negative all day long as well, but did not have the late-day struggles of the Nasdaq. The blue-chip index lost 120. (source: CNNfn) http://cnnfn.com/2000/06/22/markets/markets_newyork/ Dow Jones Industrials: 10376.12 -121.63 -1.16% |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
This morning's futures trading suggested that the market might take a breather today, but investors had something to say about that. The major indices fought off the selling pressure and closed the day with modest, though significant gains. Microsoft powered both the Nasdaq and the Dow higher, with gains of 51 and 63, respecively. (source: Washington Post) http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33759-2000Jun21.html Dow Jones Industrials: 10497.74 +62.58 +0.60% |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
The good news is that the Nasdaq closed above 4000 for the first time since April. The bad news was the Dow had another triple-digit loss. The tech index only posted a 24 point gain but closed at 4113.36, above a psychological hurdle. The Nasdaq stayed in the green despite selling pressure from the Dow all day long. The Blue Chips closed 122 points in the hole. (source: CNNfn) http://cnnfn.com/2000/06/20/markets/markets_newyork Dow Jones Industrials: 10435.16 -122.68 -1.16% |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
European technology shares rallied Tuesday to send all of the region's major equity markets modestly higher, with the blue-chip index in Paris leading the region as its telecom components weighed in with sharp advances. (source: CNNfn) http://cnnfn.com/2000/06/20/markets/markets_europe/ |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
Bull vs. bear: MarketWatch's Joe Battapaglia sees the economic slowdown powering a major rally while David Tice begs to differ. (source: CBS MarketWatch) http://www.marketwatch.com/news/current/battipaglia.htx http://www.marketwatch.com/news/current/commentary.htx In brief: - The Japanese sibling of the tech-studded U.S. Nasdaq market opened its doors on Monday, inviting investors and listing aspirants into an era of opportunity but ushering in new competition for other markets. |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
The tech sector led the markets higher to start the week, with Intel leading the way. The Nasdaq gained 129, more than 3.3% on the day. The Dow was led higher by the financials and picked up 109 points, about 1%. However, there were more earnings warnings during trading as Honeywell and eMachines were the latest companies to express concerns. (source: Washington Post) http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21496-2000Jun19.html Dow Jones Industrials: 10557.84 +108.54 +1.04% |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
Weakness in the financial sector put the hurt on the Dow today. The blue-chip index took a 266-point hit, a drop of nearly 2.5%. The tech sector was able to weather the storm that afflicted the Dow and the Nasdaq posted a modest 15 point gain on the day. (source: CNNfn) http://cnnfn.com/2000/06/16/markets/markets_newyork/ Dow Jones Industrials: 10449.30 -265.52 -2.48% |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
Like a champ, the Nasdaq picked itself up off the canvas and rallied to close in solidly positive territory. Down all morning the tech-index benefited from a rotation out of financials in afternoon trading and closed up 48 points, more then 1.25%. The Dow was positive all day long, but closed off of its highs at 20 points in the positive. (source: Washington Post) http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63666-2000Jun15.html Dow Jones Industrials: 10714.82 +26.87 +0.25% |
| This topic is 36 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 All times are EST (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.43
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.
Press ctrl-D to bookmark this page for future reference.
By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use.
Copyright 2001 InvestorGuide.com Inc.