|
Investorville
![]() D
![]() Drugstore.com (DSCM) (Page 1)
|
| This topic is 4 pages long: 1 2 3 4 | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Drugstore.com (DSCM) |
|
InvestorGuide Daily Administrator |
Company Name (Ticker): reported, expected, same q last year Drugstore.com (DSCM): -$0.33, -$0.35, -$0.86 |
|
Earnings Administrator |
Company Name (Ticker): reported, expected, same q last year Drugstore.com (DSCM): -$0.45, -$0.55, -$0.84 |
|
gardd unregistered |
Have anyone got any thoughts about this company today? I wonder if it is wise to enter the company right now, or should I wait more? I checked on nasdaq.com and choosed analyst's recommendations and they say "strong buy" for DSCM. Any opinions? |
|
Earnings Administrator |
Company Name (Ticker): reported, expected, same q last year Drugstore.com (DSCM): -$0.58, -$0.64, -$0.76 |
|
Earnings Administrator |
Company Name (Ticker): reported, expected, same q last year Drugstore.com (DSCM): -$0.83, -$0.98, n/a |
|
Earnings Administrator |
Company (ticker): reported, expected, same q last year Drugstore.com (DSCM): -$0.86, -$1.04, n/a |
|
JHirsch |
"Bezos and Drugstore.com CEO Peter Neupert, seated next to him during the interview, said they do not spend much time thinking about their stock prices." First, I'm not sure if I believe it, but if it is true, isn't it a mistake? Their stock is the currency with which they make acquisitions. Not being able to do much about it is one thing, but not caring is a bit cavalier. |
|
newsman |
from an article in Upside: Drugstore.com (Nasdaq: DSCM) "At its IPO, in July 1999, Drugstore.com was King of the Forest, Alpha Lion all the way. With venture-capital support from the venerable granddaddy of venture capital, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, and a 46 percent stake held by Amazon.com, the torch of optimism was burning bright. Indeed, from a simple business plan 18 months ago that received $3 million in financing, Drugstore.com has become a trusted brand name; it was rated in the fourth quarter of 1999 by Gomez Advisors as the #1 online drugstore in terms of customer confidence, has $200 million in financing, 408 employees, and 695,000 customers. Sales for calendar 1999 were $34.848 million, with a net loss of $115.83 million. This loss is 14.4 times as big as the loss in calendar 1998, when there were no sales. Do we see a fire hose headed toward that burning torch? Yes, ma'am. This summer, 25 percent of Drugstore.com was sold to plague-ridden drugstore chain Rite Aid (RAD). Through this deal, Drugstore.com accessed PCS, Rite Aid's in-house pharmaceutical benefit management company, as well as millions of dollars' worth of promotions throughout the chain. But, the Rite Aid deal quickly became a soap opera. With accounting problems and competition from rival chain CVS (CVS) to worry about, Rite Aid quickly took advantage of the inflated market for Internet equities and reduced its stake in Drugstore.com to 15.5 percent. Then Rite Aid sold off PCS, eliminating Drugstore.com's access to its members. So, how is Drugstore.com planning to get out of this mess? The same way it got into it in the first place: through another public offering. On February 10, just as Rite Aid was decreasing its stake, Drugstore.com filed with the SEC for a second public offering. Of course, this might help with the funding shortfall, but it will lower the already sagging share price even more. According to CEO Peter Neupert, Drugstore.com won't be profitable for three to six years. We believe that the industry model will have drastically changed by then. Meanwhile, Drugstore.com's revenue has failed to offset mushrooming expenditures. At sales of nearly $16 million in fiscal 1999, the company is losing 8.4 times as much money as it did when it had no sales at all. Charming. The IPO hype is over. The sober facts tell a disappointing story: DSCM is a money-losing company that is not going to get out of the red anytime soon. With recent partnership problems and intense competition from PlanetRX (PLRX) and CVS.com, Drugstore.com shares are going to go down like a Russian space station." |
|
trendy |
Yes, it's silly for a company to raise money when the stock has fallen so much, because they have to give up a lot more equity to get the cash they want. However, etailers like Drugstore.com don't have the luxury of raising money whenever conditions are favorable, because they're burning through their money and if they don't get it when they need it then they're out of business. |
|
scripter |
Drugstore.com raised $102.6 million in a secondary public offering last week. The Amazon.com-backed company sold 6 million shares at $18 a piece, raising $108 million before expenses. Isn't it silly that they're raising money now, after their stock price has been deflated so much? |
|
newsman |
Interview with the founder of Drugstore.com: http://interviews.strategyweek.com/rs.nsf/Interviews/Jed+Smith?OpenDocument |
|
chengrob |
Check out this article about drugstore.com. http://www.mystonedthoughts.com Rob |
|
scripter |
It doesn't make any sense to exclude expenses related to stock-based compensation. This cost was just as real as any other they incurred, even if it's more difficult to measure. Factoring this in, the loss would be much worse. |
|
Trader Joe |
From CNET: Internet retailer Drugstore.com today posted a $42 million loss for its first quarter as a public company but said revenues tripled from the previous quarter. The Bellevue, Washington-based company, backed by e-commerce leader Amazon.com, the Rite Aid drugstore chain, and others, lost $1.04 per share in the third quarter, assuming conversion of preferred shares, on revenues of $12.1 million. The company, which opened its virtual doors February 25, had revenues of $3.6 million in the second quarter. Excluding charitable contributions and expenses related to stock-based compensation, Drugstore.com lost 72 cents per share, compared with an average estimate of 73 cents by the four brokerages that have published reports on the company. In one measure of its growth, Drugstore.com said it had served a total of 428,000 unique Amazon.com owns 26 percent of Drugstore.com. The stock went public at $18 in July, |
|
humanity |
I was just reading the conversation over on the Barnes and Noble board about utilizing the offline store to supplement the online store, and it really reminded me of the Drugstore.com/Rite Aid deal, which I am liking more and more. As part of the Rite Aid agreement, customers can now order their drugs online at Drugstore.com and pick them up at any of Rite Aid's 3,800 stores, taking the two- to three-day shipping wait out of the picture for customers who need their prescriptions filled right away. In addition, Rite Aid agreed as part of the deal to promote Drugstore.com on shopping bags, receipts, and pharmacy packaging. I really think this is a perfect synergy between two companies who understand that an offline partnership can provide much added value to an online company. |
| This topic is 4 pages long: 1 2 3 4 All times are EST (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.43
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.
Press ctrl-D to bookmark this page for future reference.
By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use.
Copyright 2001 InvestorGuide.com Inc.